LaVoy Finicum autopsy report.

lavoy hand up dont shoot.jpgJust got my hands on the autopsy report for LaVoy performed by the state investigators.  Posting the link here.  Will report more when I get a chance to read all of it, but the first thing I want answered is WHY WOULD THEY HANDCUFF A DEAD MAN?  LaVoy autopsy report



03/14/2016   Update:  Thank you to one of my followers for posting the link below which explains why they would handcuff him.


Justified or Murder?

Justified or Murder?lavoy with daughter

Today, the powers that be in the state of Oregon decided that they would make the claim that state police and the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team were “justified” in shooting and killing Robert “LaVoy” Finicum. They also released a video in which they synched the FBI video with the video taken by Shawna Cox, from inside the truck, to show their justification.,AAAAPLpuSqE~,a1DdoZJH5WQo4iWaJj1w_CktvJfhQVVG

During the news conference they also released what they claim is the autopsy picture of where LaVoy’s gunshot wounds were. They said that he was shot three times and the picture shows one In the shoulder, one in lower right back, and one in the neck. If this is supposed to be an accurate accounting of the autopsy then where is the shot that pierced his heart as they say in the article? [i]   According to this video of said picture.,AAAAPLpuSqE~,a1DdoZJH5WQo4iWaJj1w_CktvJfhQVVG

Continue reading

“What does the Constitution say”?

reprinted from the article on the link below.

What Does the Constitution Say? Lawyers and scholars have been dumbfounded until now. Go to to learn more.

How many Americans echoing Save the Constitution ever ask, “What does the Constitution say? Do you know that the United States Constitution was derived from the Constitution of 1787, which is one of the four Organic Laws of the United States of America. Did you know there are three offices of President in the Constitution of 1787. Were you taught about the Organic Laws of the United States of America in school?

Continue reading

What LaVoy stood for.

We all know that LaVoy was murdered (at least in most reasonable people eyes) by the powers that be, but hear his wife talk about the situation and how they are being kept out of the know when it comes to the legalities of this situation. Her attorney cannot get to the truck to see the evidence; she can’t release the autopsy report until the FBI releases their report (which I doubt that they will do until after the state rules on whether or not they HAVE to release the name of the officer that murdered him.) We all know not to believe what comes from the main stream media in anything, but the fact that they have treated this group of individuals as terrorist when they were the ones that were caught slithering around the armory. I don’t doubt they were also the ones that were following the town’s people and harassing them. To many times they call them names, and tried to put them down, but once the murder happened, the FBI really showed their true colors. Reports that you didn’t see on msm were the locals being forced out of their vehicles by the FBI, they were put to on the ground, handcuffed, their cars searched, they were searched, and then made to walk to the next check point while an agent drove their car there….all these reports are coming from the locals mind you. They were threatened with being beaten in the groin with the butt of their guns if they didn’t stop talking. They threatened them up until the last 4 left the refuge. Then they still have blockades in the area while they did wrap up the situation. This was a police state…when they follow you in town and stop you if you have an out of state tag as some of the locals were also reporting. When did it become OK for a police state to happen in America? All because the federal government thinks that they own some land, which indeed they cannot own by order of the Constitution Article 1 section 8 clause 17 (Government[i]) specifically says, “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And” Which means that they can not own any land outside of the ten square miles of DC without approval from the state legislature, and then only to be used for bases, military forts, etc. They DO NOT OWN THE LAND, yet they are taking peoples land from them every day and because it has happened for so many years everyone thinks that it is OK. The people of America either do not understand the Constitution or they don’t realize that WE THE PEOPLE are in charge and that the government works for us, not the other way around.

[i]   US Government, Constitution Transcript, “To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And” accessed Feb. 24, 2016

The UN and the take over of the world government.

Did you know that the United Nations published a report in 1995 that specifically stated what they want to do to the countries of this world?  The report by the Commission on Global Governance is titled “Our Global Neighborhood”.  Some of their plans have already began, and some are in the process.  I encourage everyone to read this and compare it with the UN Agenda 21 which has now turned into

Global Goals, charting sustainable development for people and planet by 2030″

Quote from  “Our Global Neighborhood”-”

“Although states are sovereign,
they are not free
individually to do
whatever they want”
Read the complete report here. Or here to download.  Our Global Neighborhood UN book published 1996


Militant, Militia, or Patriot?

What is the difference and why does it matter in the Oregon situation?

Let’s start with the word “militant”, which conjures up visions of ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Horom, and other militaries trying to control the world and injure as many people as possible. According to Merriam Webster a militant is defined as “engaged in warfare or combat :” a militant person. [1]

Why is this so important in the Bundy situation at the Malheur Wildlife Refuge? If the President can get everyone to address those at the refuge as militants, then the President can use drones to kill off those that will not comply as per this article, “The Obama administration, Holder said, rejected the use of military force where “well-established law enforcement authorities in this country provide the best means for incapacitating a terrorist threat.” But in theory, it’d be legal for the president to order such an attack under certain circumstances, Holder said.”[2]

Militia is defined my Webster as: “: a group of people who are not part of the armed forces of a country but are trained like soldiers”. [3]

Cornell Law defines militia as: 10 U.S. Code § 311 – Militia: composition and classes

“(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are—

(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval     Militia; and

(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.” [4]


Militia then is a group of individuals who are trained like soldiers, but not part of the military. They can be called out by the county sheriff to assist in the community should there be a need for them, to help secure and protect. If for example there is a small disaster in the county and the all of the police, sheriff, and deputies have already been dispatched, but help is still needed, the militia would then be called out. Then should more assistance be needed the governor could call in the National Guard.


The patriots in each state would be the 3%, the Oathkeepers, and others with different names in other states such as the Pacific Patriots Network (PPN) in the Pacific area of the country. The mission statement of the PPN says, “”The mission of Pacific Patriots Network is to provide a comprehensive and integrated response that coordinates community resources to protect life, liberty, property and the environment of our communities through mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery from all natural and man-made hazards that may impact our communities. We are our communities first responders.” [5]

As you can see, the terminology used by the President, the main stream media, and others who report the news of the Oregon situation can determine how those patriots and militia who were there to fight for the rights of all Americans are thought of.  The fact is that once the media started calling them “militants” they put them on the wrong side of the situation and deemed that people should hate them, when the reality is far from that.  Those people were there to fight for the rights of not only the ranchers who were having their land stolen by the BLM according to their reports, but to fight for every American to own and keep their land protected from the federal government over reach.



[1] Merriam Webster definition of “militant”, “engaged in warfare or combat”,
[2] Eric Holder: Drone Strike To Kill U.S. Citizen On American Soil Legal, Hypothetically
[3] Merriam Webster definition of “militia”, : a group of people who are not part of the armed forces of a country but are trained like soldiers”,
[4] 10 U.S. Code § 311 – Militia: composition and classes,
[5] Pacific Patriots Network Mission Statement,


LaVoy Finicum, what really happened?

lavoy with daughter

It seems that every time something happens in our country that goes against what the leftist want you to believe, the people involved are viciously attacked and labeled in the mainstream media, which are owned and operated by the elitist of the country.  However, the facts are not always as the msm presents to you.  Such is the situation of the Oregon refuge situation, the patriots, individuals involved, and the death of a great man.

LaVoy Finicum was a rancher, father, grandfather, and a great leader.  He had 11 children, was a foster parent, and a firm believer in God. He believed that God had a reason for him being at the Oregon refuge and said many times that he would not shoot unless he was shot at.  However, the facts that the msm is putting out there about his death is being falsely presented.  First, it has been reported by those who knew LaVoy that he carried his weapon on his right hip because he was right handed and was photographed many times with it on his right hip.  It has been stated that he left his firearm at the refuge by people who knew him, and in a situation that the person wasn’t even thinking about what they were saying, but that is for another time.  What I want to get into right now is the eyewitness testimonies.  You have the one guy, Mark McConnell, who came out in a hurry with his version of what happened that fatal night in Oregon, and made statements as though they were his own, but then yesterday apologized in his facebook post saying that he should not have used someone else’s words.  Here is that apology.  What is really interesting is that there are two eyewitnesses who contradict his version of the story, one by Shawna Cox that is posted on Free Capitalist website.    This is her statement that day and you can hear the fear and excitement in her voice as she relates what truly happened.

So the question is WHY is the msm not reporting these eyewitness stories?  Considering that the FBI is saying there was only 6 shots fired and they are telling a different story.  Shame on all msm for not reporting these stories.  Watch the videos and demand the truth be told.

Actual shooting video shows that his arms were in the air until the first shot, then he grabs his side.  Then you notice what appears to be a shot from behind which buckles his knees slightly.  When he turns, still holding his wound, he is shot from the front by the guy that came out of the trees.  If you go to youtube and watch the FBI uncut, unedited, HD version, you will see that they have lasers on him after he is shot and some type of flash goes off right next to his head.  While we can’t know 100% what happened until this footage is zoomed and analyzed, and the lapel videos are released or the video shot inside the truck is released, we can see that he was as compliant as you can be while trying to walk in that depth of snow for a man of his age.  Yes, his hands went down, but then right back up as if he is trying to catch his balance.

What really pisses off a lot of people right now is the fact that those are the refuge were peaceful, were not breaking any laws (refer my article from the other day), and they would never have shot unless they were shot at illegally, and the local, state, and federal officials tried their best to threaten, intimidate, and run these people off.  This is a double standard since in 2015 alone this country has seen violent riots in Baltimore, Ferguson, and other places all in the name of protest, where buildings were burnt, people were beaten, police were threatened and charged with weapons and Molotov cocktails, yet they let them burn themselves out.

People of this country need to understand and stand up for their Constitutional rights, the rights of your children, and the rights of those who can’t stand.  It is far past time for people to give up the racial, hatred rhetoric and understand that tyranny has no color or nationality boundaries.  If you allow things to happen to one person, you soon will leave your freedoms too.


First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”                                written by Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)