UN free zone? That is what he said…

I have one major question  What would it matter to the “FBI” if Grant County Sheriff Glenn Palmer did understand that the federal government can’t own the land that the refuge is on?  What would it matter if he knows that he is the ultimate authority within the county and can kick the FBI, BLM, and other federal agencies out if the county doesn’t want them there?  What would all that matter in the supposed “traffic stop” and shooting of LaVoy Finicum.  Officer 1, who through his various testimonies and the testimonies of other officers I believe was the “liaison” with the FBI as well as being the one that fired the shots at LaVoy’s truck as he approached the “kill box” (in my opinion), and he shot LaVoy twice.  So why would he say that, “I knew going into it there was a sheriff in Grant County that was supporting the movement or the ideology behind what they were pushing.  I knew that there was a large amount of community members in Grant County that supported their beliefs, and that had similar Constitutional beliefs, and to the point of the Grant County making it clear that they are a UN FREE ZONE (emphasis mine), and so that knowledge was known to all of us, that for a very simple way to put it, they were not friendly to law enforcement conducting any enforcement actions, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the federal agencies…” which appeared on page 111 of the redacted police report.  So, my question is, who exactly are these people who were passing themselves off as FBI?  If they were not doing anything illegal then why would they worry about the sheriff not supporting their agenda?  Furthermore, why would they consider Sheriff Palmer a “security risk” as stated by those who are making claims against him and demanding an investigation so they didn’t even tell him about the operation they had planned.

I look forward to all the facts coming out in this case and to finding out just who these people really are.  Some are saying that they are UN troops, some are saying they were blackwater mercenaries with the IMF out of France.  Will be interesting to find out.
UN free zone.png

Advertisements

Is your sheriff Constitutional?

USA Constitution Parchment

USA Constitution Parchment

The sheriff is the ultimate law enforcement power in any state and it is the duty of the “elected” sheriff to protect the people of the county from all enemies both foreign and domestic. So when Sheriff Glenn Palmer of Grant County, Oregon tells the federal agencies that they are not welcome in his county or he refuses to bow down to the UN, he is literally doing the job he was elected to do. Same goes for any sheriff of any county in the united States.

“In Mack/Printz v USA, the U S Supreme Court declared that the states or their political subdivisions, “are not subject to federal direction.” The issue of federal authority is defined even further in this most powerful Tenth Amendment decision. The two sheriffs who brought the suit objected to being forced into federal service without compensation pursuant to some misguided provisions of the Brady Bill. The sheriffs sued the USA (Clinton adm.) and won a major landmark case in favor of States’ Rights and local autonomy. In this ruling by the Supreme Court, some amazing principles were exposed regarding the lack of power and authority the federal government actually has. In fact, this is exactly the issue addressed by the court when Justice Scalia opined for the majority stating, “…the Constitution’s conferral upon Congress of not all governmental powers, but only discreet, enumerated ones.”

Continue reading